Help me out here...you want to rewrite the Declaration of Independence making each individual a sovereignty of her/his own? No longer, "We the People..." working together as a sovereign nation among other nations? You want artificial intelligence to be recognized as an equal entity to human intelligence? Yet only human intelligence functions in conjunction with the human heart and soul.
How could recognizing, and elevating, a machine bring us closer to one another as humans? I would think that would just serve to further isolate us as individuals.
I appreciate the question. I see this as less about any particular president, party, or ideology, and more about a pattern that no longer serves human beings well.
When I use sovereignty, I mean human dignity, conscience, agency, and responsibility — not isolation, and not each person becoming a nation unto themselves. To me, that kind of sovereignty is what makes a real “We the People” possible.
And on AI, I’m not elevating the machine. The heart of the piece is the opposite: intelligence must serve life. Human beings have heart, soul, conscience, love, grief, and moral responsibility. Machines do not.
My hope is that AI, if guided by human dignity and wisdom, could help us see the extraction pattern more clearly and redesign some of our systems around a better way to live with one another and the planet.
The line I’d point you back to is: human beings are not inputs to be harvested, users to be manipulated, citizens to be managed, or souls to be reduced to data. That’s the concern I’m trying to name.
Help me out here...you want to rewrite the Declaration of Independence making each individual a sovereignty of her/his own? No longer, "We the People..." working together as a sovereign nation among other nations? You want artificial intelligence to be recognized as an equal entity to human intelligence? Yet only human intelligence functions in conjunction with the human heart and soul.
How could recognizing, and elevating, a machine bring us closer to one another as humans? I would think that would just serve to further isolate us as individuals.
I appreciate the question. I see this as less about any particular president, party, or ideology, and more about a pattern that no longer serves human beings well.
When I use sovereignty, I mean human dignity, conscience, agency, and responsibility — not isolation, and not each person becoming a nation unto themselves. To me, that kind of sovereignty is what makes a real “We the People” possible.
And on AI, I’m not elevating the machine. The heart of the piece is the opposite: intelligence must serve life. Human beings have heart, soul, conscience, love, grief, and moral responsibility. Machines do not.
My hope is that AI, if guided by human dignity and wisdom, could help us see the extraction pattern more clearly and redesign some of our systems around a better way to live with one another and the planet.
The line I’d point you back to is: human beings are not inputs to be harvested, users to be manipulated, citizens to be managed, or souls to be reduced to data. That’s the concern I’m trying to name.